Difference between revisions of "Elements in deliberation"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(→Conformation bias) |
(→Social Ques information carries by the meduim) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===Synchronic or a synchronic=== | ===Synchronic or a synchronic=== | ||
| − | ===Social | + | ===Social Queues information carries by the meduim=== |
People needs social information, like body language, intonations and facial expressions to better understand each other. The more the medium can transfer social information, the better and faster the understanding will be, and they can also [[trust]] each other more<ref>Bicchieri, C., Lev-On, A., & Chavez, A. (2010). The medium or the message? Communication relevance and richness in trust games. Synthese, 176(1), 125–147.</ref>. Therefore face to face meetings will be better from video conferences and video conferences will be better the teleconferences, and they will be better than emails (emails will have an advantage in deliberation, because all the formers were synchronous mediums which slow down the pace of group talks, while emails are a synchronous). | People needs social information, like body language, intonations and facial expressions to better understand each other. The more the medium can transfer social information, the better and faster the understanding will be, and they can also [[trust]] each other more<ref>Bicchieri, C., Lev-On, A., & Chavez, A. (2010). The medium or the message? Communication relevance and richness in trust games. Synthese, 176(1), 125–147.</ref>. Therefore face to face meetings will be better from video conferences and video conferences will be better the teleconferences, and they will be better than emails (emails will have an advantage in deliberation, because all the formers were synchronous mediums which slow down the pace of group talks, while emails are a synchronous). | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Summery''': | ||
| + | * The more social queues a medium can carry, the better and faster participants will understand each other. | ||
==Groups Size Elements== | ==Groups Size Elements== | ||
Revision as of 02:37, 15 June 2014
Elements in deliberation are elemnts that influance the outcome of deliberation. They interact with each other to change the results of deliberation.
Contents
Communication Elements
The oreder of talking
Synchronic or a synchronic
Social Queues information carries by the meduim
People needs social information, like body language, intonations and facial expressions to better understand each other. The more the medium can transfer social information, the better and faster the understanding will be, and they can also trust each other more[1]. Therefore face to face meetings will be better from video conferences and video conferences will be better the teleconferences, and they will be better than emails (emails will have an advantage in deliberation, because all the formers were synchronous mediums which slow down the pace of group talks, while emails are a synchronous).
Summery:
- The more social queues a medium can carry, the better and faster participants will understand each other.
Groups Size Elements
Epistemic Elements
Priming
Questions
Psychological Elements
Conformation bias
(which is related also to priming Also, the perceived honor of the speakers.
References
- ↑ Bicchieri, C., Lev-On, A., & Chavez, A. (2010). The medium or the message? Communication relevance and richness in trust games. Synthese, 176(1), 125–147.