3,078
edits
Changes
→Questions in Mind
* '''Share of interests and working as a group:''' By using good deliberation (we should try to explain what is good deliberation), we may get more people into collaboration, because their private interests are better incorporated into the doing of the group. In ideal-free groups, this will enable larger groups to gather. In Hirarchical groups that pay people to come to work, this will loosens the "ego" (persevering self intrest). And will let people contribute more to the good of the group. For instance, I need a room for the meeting of citizens, but other department need this room for storage of old staff. Because we do not have the same goal, and we may be rivals for power and promotion, the other department will not have intrest to give me the room. But if we will work as a team, and we will be rewarded as a team (and each of us as a contributer to the good of the group), we may be able to give the citizens better products. Especially if the citizens will know that the room is the contribution of department of X.
** '''Private reward''':When collaborating people get reward from work team (appreciation from team members). But will it work in Hierarchical work places? *** What are the rewards of managers in work hirarchical work places?****[http://www.inc.com/magazine/19890601/5688.html Survey on Inc]****[http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jun2009/db2009064_232371.htm Assey on Business Week that say that middle mangers like to be heard and be part of the game] ****Power to control others?****Prestige?****Feel of excellence?****Impulse to change the world around me?