3,078
edits
Changes
→Creating and evaluating options
It is perfectly all right not to be able to create unanimous [[SON]]. Although it is preferable to create a son, for mutual understanding, it is natural, that not all members will agree upon the issues that are discussed.
==Creating and evaluating options==
The next element in deliberative decision making is creating alternative options to solve the common challenge. There are many methods to create a diversity of options. and in different situations the amount of diversity may alter, for instance in fast decisions, we might have a small number of options, while in a large-scale decision that includes many members there might be more options.
==Evaluating=====Validating===After creating a large number of options, the options should be validated and tagged for , using falsification. ===Chances of sucess===Each option has a different chance of success. The members should figure out what is the number chance of success in each option.===ROI===Each option has it own outcomes, and resources needed to carry it on. ===Value===When investing in an option, each member has its own resource, and therefore she might evaluate differently the ability willingness to harness such resourcestake each action. Alsoalso, there should be an estimation of what benefits she might value defiantly each option should give. for instance, some will value peach very high, and what are the chances of it to materializewhile others will prefer vendetta over peace. therefor preferring options differently.
[[File:General deliberation process - validate-evaluate.jpg|1100px]]
==Selecting==