Changes

#Less need for group defense and strong leadership.

When in [[FFFF]] mode, participants will have trouble deliberating from the next several reasons:

#When in FFFF, participants tend to look for strong theories, that they can rely upon. They will look for the most simple solutions, and therefore will resist more subtle and complex descriptions of the situation.

# They will judge leaders by their "strength" that is reviled by the leader's rhetoric.

# As a result, It seems that conservatives tend to less participate in deliberation<ref>[http://www.delib-democracy.org/2014/05/29/do-conservatives-tend-to-avoid-deliberation/ Tal Yaron, 2014, Do conservatives tend to avoid deliberation?, The deliberative democracy institute blog]</ref>.

===Facilitating Deliberation in FFFF situations===

To enable deliberation, therefore I'll suggest to main root should be taken. One is elevating the level of trust between groups, and the other is to make deliberation more time-efficient. The threat perception should be reduced, by creating games and interactions that make the participant know more of each other, and trust each other. One example, I have heard of was a of a facilitator that worked with Israeli and Arab youth. Both team didn't trust each other. To elevate trust, the facilitator ordered the youngsters, to help him carry wooden logs from one side of the camp to the other. To complete the mission, both groups needed to work together. This mission, the facilitator testified, helped bring the groups together and the deliberation improved afterward.