3,078
edits
Changes
no edit summary
My Name is Tal Yaron, and I am autodidacte in the Filed of Deliberation (and many other fields). I have a M.Sc. in biology, and started a Ph.D. in biology. While I was reading the scientific litreture and participated in confrence, I have noitced that I can not see logic in the scientific communication. When I tried to follow the logic from premisis to conclusions, it did not worked out. I have started to learn logic in order to see the logic in the paper but it didn't follow any roles of logic, I have lernt. Therefore I have read Popper's book "The Logic of Scientific Discovery", but again, Popper's logic, was not the one that I found in the litreture. The ridle had puzzled me, so I moved to the program of History and Philosophy of Science in Bar-Ilan university. There I was introduced to the constructivists writings on science, yet their writings did not pleased me. I thought it has critical nature but they can not explain the science I have exprienced it in my years at biology department. Therefore, I have set my self to try to explain science as I have exprienced it. for four years I have devised a model of scientific reason. After four years, and nudges from the head of the program, I have started to show the model to researchers in philosophy. Most of them said in is intresting, but it is to new, but it is too wide, to be a Ph.D. thesis. I couldn't find anyone that will mentor me.So I left the academy to try to develop this model on my own.