Changes

This Process of suggesting induction, refutation and resuggesting a more complex induction, is a continued process of creating knowledge.

[[File:MO.JPG|200px|thumb|right|construction of Mental Object by recurrence of several sensory stimuli simultaneously]]

Somtimes the brain finds several connections between diffrent SPs, that come toghther. When several connections are reoccuring they form a cluster of inductions. I call this cluster of induction a Mental Object ([[MO]]). It is an object that sotres many inductions that relate to eache other. For instance a specfic smell may come always when specific shape and specifice color and specific feeling. A smell of an apple may come with a shape of an apple, a color of an apple and a taste of an apple. This cluster of inductions will create for us a femiler object that when ever we observ one of it's SP, we will assume that all other SPs will appaer also. If we will also hear the same name ("apple") every time we will see some of the connected appreances, we will also give him a name: "apple"<ref>Wittgenstein, L. (1973). Philosophical Investigations (3rd Edition) (p. 250). Pearson.</ref> that will be part of the mental object.

To decide ifbetween alternatives we may need some more avidance. Further evidance may suggest that we should divied it to two diffrent mental objects. For instance if our theoris will be sufficiantly developed to the point when we recognize a "DNA" thus we may find that they have a DNA linage that is very diffrent, and because we defined DNA as an assntial proprtie of a leaving object, we may decide that they are two diffrent mental objects.

[[File:Deductions-Platos-mother.JPG|right|thumb|200px|We duduce by going through connected [[MO]]s]]

Mental Objects construct our understanding of the world. When we reason, we can go along the lines of connected [[MO]]s. For instance, humans have many inductions. We know that they have two legs, two arms, they leave up to 120 years, and in the meanwhile they breath, born and die, and many other inductions ([[why an object don't has proprties but it has inductions|mistakenly called proprties]]). We also know (or conjecture) that Socrates was human, and as such he has all the inductions of the ''MO:humans''.

{{nc|More ilustrations will be very helpfull. If equations can be enterd, this will be awsome.|[[User:WinSysop|Tal Yaron]] 09:13, 14 December 2012 (IST)}}

Some times we have gaps between our mental objects. These gaps usually [[RPE|puzzle us]] and we look for an explanation or some intermediate MO that will closes the gap. Therefore we invent an unseen MO to bridge the gap. When we invent the bridging MO, we usually imagine it and we do not get if from phenomenological intervals (when we will further research, we will see that all MOs are imaginary mental objects), therefore we will call it Imaginary Mental Object or [[iMO]], while the objects obtained from phenomenological intervals will call Sensory Mental Objects([[sMO]]).