3,078
edits
Changes
→Simplicity
====Simplicity====
The relation induction between two SPs might be very simple. They may be linked directly. For instance, A a sound of a broken glass may be directly connected to a look of a braking glass, because the Neumann that creates these two specific SPs, is always behave like that. But it can be connected in more complex wayways, for instance there the Neumann that creates these two SPs may be some a computer that create a breaking sound, whenever I see he creates a visual SP of breaking glass. Or this connection induction may be correct describe well the relation between the SPs until some timesometime, and it may be wrong not describe the relation in some the future time<ref>[http://www.amazon.com/Fact-Fiction-Forecast-Fourth-Edition/dp/0674290712 Goodman, N., & Putnam, H. (1983). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Fourth Edition (p. 160). Harvard University Press.]</ref>. The reason to chose choose the most simple connection simplest induction is because the number of available possible relations between a sound and a breaking glass are infinite. Therefore for reasons of effective storage, we will use the simplest solution available, which will be ''"All breaking glasses has this specific sound"''.
====Refutation====
For tha sake of economic usage of memory storage we will assume the simplest inductions between SPs. Yet, in the commeing events we may notice that the induction do not describe well the relation between the SPs. We might find that although we have the induction "smell<sub>x</sub> always come with sound<sub>y</sub>", we might notice that in the comming observations sound<sub>y</sub> donot follow smell<sub>x</sub>/
Stored in Memory...
opp...