Deliberation
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
Revision as of 17:45, 4 November 2012 by 109.160.136.155 (talk) (→Systematic Approach To Deliberation)
aspects of deliberation
Contents
Systematic Approach To Deliberation
Justification of Deliberation
Deliberation systems have three main functions, according to the the writers of Deliberative systems[1]. The three are Epistemic, Ethic and Democratic. On the epistemic consideration, It should produce well informed decisions. In the ethic side, deliberation creates more bonding between citizens. In the democratic perspective deliberation should take into account inputs from wider prompt opinions of the population, when making decisions.
On using Experts in Deliberation
Although experts are sometimes crucial for deliberation, because they hold more corroborated SON, there are some concern that should be addresses when expert are taking part in a deliberation. Expert may harm deliberation in those aspects:
- Epistemically, delegation of deliberation to expert can promote citizen ignorance.
- Expert themselves can be biased (as was suggested by Loerenz et al.[2])
Epistemic Considerations
Settings of Deliberation
large groups on-line deliberation
Distortions in Reason
For unloigical and intutive reasoning, see Intuitive Decision Making in "Decision Making"
Psychological considerations
Settings that promote system 2 discussion
methods of deliberation
Criticism on deliberation
See Also
References
- ↑ Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. (Eds.). (2012). Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (p. 204). Cambridge University Press. p.10-12
- ↑ Lorenz et al., How social infulence can underminr the wisdom of the crowds effect, 2011, PNAS