Actions

National Issues Forum

From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki

Revision as of 14:44, 10 July 2014 by WinSysop (talk | contribs) (NIF Process)

National Issues Forum or NIF, is a method for deliberative democracy in the USA.

NIF Process

National issues forum process.jpg

1) NIF is desigen for large masses face-to-face deliberation, therfore it is hard to create large diversity of options. To overcome this obsitcale, experts are preparing 2-4 options before the start of the deliberation process. The NIF manual does not describe how the deliberation of the expert are done.

2) Participent recive the booklet that the experts preperd and. they may be curious (question mark) about the meeting, and may read it, in order to prepare themselves for the event. I am not sure how many read the booklet and preper themselves. From what I have seen, most don't read it.

3) After intial intoduction that explain the importance of the subject in hand, a short movie inteoduce the subject in bitsound fashion. This movie, if done properly, puzle the participent and elvate their curiosity.

4) This curiosty is create motivation for listening to the experts that introduce the subject to the audiance.

experts knowledge

In NIF, experts knowledge is introduced (and framed ) by a book which is prepared by the comity or other agency. The book describe 3-4 options to solve an issue[1]

At the begging, a short movie that explain the issue is introduced[2]

Psychological Settings

facilitators charge participants to listen with respect; to consider all perspectives, including those that different from their own; and to seek common ground.

Participation

They encourage everybody to participate.

modorators encourage people to explain even unpopular epproches.

Learning

People are encouraged to tell a their story in the issue, to get people engage the issue (story telling).

Evaluating

Modorators encourage participants to consider each approach fully and fairly, to illustrate each approach with personal stories and experiences, and to consider the related costs and consequences of each approach.

Selection of Common Solution

At the end, after several hours, participants are asked to describe what is the common ground. what is the real issue, what is unacceptable, and which points remain un solved. they strive to articulate a common story, as a group and to find a common path. if there is a devision, then the decision is recorded.

understanding

the facilitator is accompanied by a recorder, who write the outcome on a white board.

References

  1. Gastil j. and Levine P., 2002, The deliberative Democracy Hand Book: Strategies foe effective civic engagement in the 21st century, p.43
  2. ibid, p.45