Difference between revisions of "MO deliberation"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Some times one subject is related to another subject. So we can move between subjects. We have to write them down and summarize each agreeable point. | Some times one subject is related to another subject. So we can move between subjects. We have to write them down and summarize each agreeable point. | ||
| − | [[File:Example of MO deliberation.jpeg|275px]] | + | [[File:Example of MO deliberation.jpeg|275px|thumb|The question "how will we publicize ourselves?" is influenced by the question "who is our target audience?" so when the second question is raised, we move to it, deliberate it and go back to the first question]] |
The facilitator is the wise person who see it all, with the help of the group. But more simple work can be done by the managers. | The facilitator is the wise person who see it all, with the help of the group. But more simple work can be done by the managers. | ||
Revision as of 11:13, 30 December 2012
 This page was writen by a non-English speeking writer. Please help us improve the quality of the paper.Tal Yaron 19:07, 30 December 2012 (IST) |
The technic of discussing through points of discussion or going through MOs:
First talk a point over untill we have silence, or coll-down. We then ask the first initiater to summarize the subject, and with the help of the others, make it agreeable.
Some times one subject is related to another subject. So we can move between subjects. We have to write them down and summarize each agreeable point.
The facilitator is the wise person who see it all, with the help of the group. But more simple work can be done by the managers.
It is very important to simulate the talk on a board. Preferably, white-board. The Symboles will be with mind maps but with clear sentences.