Difference between revisions of "Radicals"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(Created page with "Radicals may use more the FFFF mechanism. By using dialog on the core issues of beliefs and theory along restraints of force, one can promote [http://www.ict.org.il/Porta...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
By using dialog on the core issues of beliefs and theory along restraints of force, one can promote [http://www.ict.org.il/Portals/0/Internet%20Monitoring%20Group/JWMG_De_Radicalization_LIFG.pdf un-radicalization]. The talks about the core ideas can help radical understand the world, and engage in a more peacful solutions. | By using dialog on the core issues of beliefs and theory along restraints of force, one can promote [http://www.ict.org.il/Portals/0/Internet%20Monitoring%20Group/JWMG_De_Radicalization_LIFG.pdf un-radicalization]. The talks about the core ideas can help radical understand the world, and engage in a more peacful solutions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In a research which I can not locate, it was found that radicals has more knowledge on the subject then modrate people. This with the assumption that we tend to defend our worldview<ref>Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion [Kindle Edition] (p. 530). Penguin. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/The-Righteous-Mind-Politics-ebook/dp/B0076O2VMI/ref=tmm_kin_title_0</ref>,may imply that radicals use knowledge and auxilury thoeries to to defend their views. This may also be the results of radicals being more afraid, and so use rationalization to make the world more explainable and safe. | ||
| + | |||
| + | What may be the implication of the above theory (if it is true)? | ||
[[category: psychology]] | [[category: psychology]] | ||
[[category:groups]] | [[category:groups]] | ||
Revision as of 02:55, 20 March 2014
Radicals may use more the FFFF mechanism.
By using dialog on the core issues of beliefs and theory along restraints of force, one can promote un-radicalization. The talks about the core ideas can help radical understand the world, and engage in a more peacful solutions.
In a research which I can not locate, it was found that radicals has more knowledge on the subject then modrate people. This with the assumption that we tend to defend our worldview[1],may imply that radicals use knowledge and auxilury thoeries to to defend their views. This may also be the results of radicals being more afraid, and so use rationalization to make the world more explainable and safe.
What may be the implication of the above theory (if it is true)?- ↑ Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion [Kindle Edition] (p. 530). Penguin. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/The-Righteous-Mind-Politics-ebook/dp/B0076O2VMI/ref=tmm_kin_title_0