Actions

Difference between revisions of "Structures of deliberation"

From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki

(Converging Discussion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Converging Discussion==
 
==Converging Discussion==
due to the problem of selecting from multiple of choices (eg Condecent-arrow problem of social choice<ref>David van Mill, ‘The Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and Procedures’, Journal of Politics 58 (1996), 734-52. </ref><ref>Dryzek, J. S., List, C., & others. (2003). Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: a reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 1–28. see the intoduction until reference 22</ref>) we need converging discussion.
+
due to the problem of selecting from multiple of choices (eg Condercent-arrow problem of social choice<ref>David van Mill, ‘The Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and Procedures’, Journal of Politics 58 (1996), 734-52. </ref><ref>Dryzek, J. S., List, C., & others. (2003). Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: a reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 1–28. see the intoduction until reference 22</ref>) we need converging discussion.
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 03:53, 11 February 2014

Converging Discussion

due to the problem of selecting from multiple of choices (eg Condercent-arrow problem of social choice[1][2]) we need converging discussion.

References

  1. David van Mill, ‘The Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and Procedures’, Journal of Politics 58 (1996), 734-52.
  2. Dryzek, J. S., List, C., & others. (2003). Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: a reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 1–28. see the intoduction until reference 22