Actions

Difference between revisions of "The problem of coordination"

From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki

Line 27: Line 27:
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordination_game Coordination game]
 
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordination_game Coordination game]
 +
 +
[[Barriers to agreements]]
  
 
[[category: deliberation]]
 
[[category: deliberation]]
 
[[category: epistemology]]
 
[[category: epistemology]]

Revision as of 00:33, 3 November 2013

framless

This page was writen by a non-English speeking writer. Please help us improve the quality of the paper.Tal Yaron 14:17, 13 March 2013 (IST)

As the number of group members grows, the number of connection lines is being enhanced quadratically

As the number of members in a group grows, the number of connections among members of the group getting higher quadratically. This is causing the slowing down of of coordination. If the group will use peer-to-peer equal terms deliberation, the amount of communication time will get bigger quadratically, thus sending the group to an halt. To solve this, groups usually use unequal methods of deliberation and influence, like hierarchical organization.

The mathematical formula for the number of connection lines in a group is:

cl=((n-1)^2+(n-1))/2

cl = connection lines; n = number of group members

In large numbers we can round up the equation to:

cl=(n^2)/2)

Thus, a group of:

  • 2 members will have 1 cl
  • 3 members will have 3 cl
  • 4 members will have 6 cl
  • 6 members will have 15 cl
  • 10 members will have 45 cl
  • 15 members will have 105 cl
  • 100 members will have 4950 cl
  • 300 million members will have 45,000,000,000,000,000 cl (This is the connection lines needed for true democracy in the USA)

One of the consequences of this proble is participation function.

See Also

Coordination game

Barriers to agreements