Difference between revisions of "Argument repertoire"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Argument repertoire is a method to measure quality of arguments in deliberation<ref>Cappella, J. N., Price, V., & Nir, L. (2002). Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: Electronic dialogue during campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19(1), 73–93.</ref> | + | Argument repertoire is a method to measure quality of arguments in deliberation<ref>Cappella, J. N., Price, V., & Nir, L. (2002). Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: Electronic dialogue during campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19(1), 73–93.</ref>. It is base on Deanna Kuhn work on arrguments<ref>Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.</ref>. For Kuhn, Those who can identify multiple explanations with genuine evidence for them, counterarguments to their own explanations, and a resolution in favor of their own explanation are at the highest levels of knowledge about the issue under discussion. |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 03:06, 21 July 2014
Argument repertoire is a method to measure quality of arguments in deliberation[1]. It is base on Deanna Kuhn work on arrguments[2]. For Kuhn, Those who can identify multiple explanations with genuine evidence for them, counterarguments to their own explanations, and a resolution in favor of their own explanation are at the highest levels of knowledge about the issue under discussion.