Difference between revisions of "Structures of deliberation"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(→Converging Discussion) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Converging Discussion== | ==Converging Discussion== | ||
| − | due to the problem of selecting from multiple of choices (eg problem of social choice<ref>David van Mill, ‘The Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and Procedures’, Journal of Politics 58 (1996), 734-52. </ref><ref>Dryzek, J. S., List, C., & others. (2003). Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: a reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 1–28. see the intoduction until reference 22</ref>) we need converging discussion. | + | due to the problem of selecting from multiple of choices (eg Condecent-arrow problem of social choice<ref>David van Mill, ‘The Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and Procedures’, Journal of Politics 58 (1996), 734-52. </ref><ref>Dryzek, J. S., List, C., & others. (2003). Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: a reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 1–28. see the intoduction until reference 22</ref>) we need converging discussion. |
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 03:53, 11 February 2014
Converging Discussion
due to the problem of selecting from multiple of choices (eg Condecent-arrow problem of social choice[1][2]) we need converging discussion.
References
- ↑ David van Mill, ‘The Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and Procedures’, Journal of Politics 58 (1996), 734-52.
- ↑ Dryzek, J. S., List, C., & others. (2003). Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: a reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 1–28. see the intoduction until reference 22