Difference between revisions of "MO deliberation"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(Created page with "The technic of discussing a point or going through MOs: First talk it over untill we have silence, or coll-down. We then will ask the first initiater to summarize the subject...") |
(→Talking points over ( epistemic-socializing MOs)) |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{en|[[User:WinSysop|Tal Yaron]] 19:07, 30 December 2012 (IST)}} | |
| − | First talk | + | __TOC__ |
| + | |||
| + | ==Starting a discussion== | ||
| + | When we start a discussion we start with a goal or a question. On the right side (in RTL languages) there is the goal. On the left side, there is the question, who do we achieve the goal. | ||
| + | [[File:MO deliberation- goal to question.jpeg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then further start to ask questions about the goal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:MO deliberation- developing questions 1.jpeg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | we then let the people try to explore the question and reach an agreement. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:MO deliberation- developing a question 1.jpeg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Talking points over ( epistemic-socializing [[MO]]s)== | ||
| + | [[File:Example of MO deliberation.jpeg|250px|thumb|The question "how will we publicize ourselves?" is influenced by the question "who is our target audience?" so when the second question is raised, we move to it, deliberate it and go back to the first question]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | First talk a point over untill we have silence, or coll-down. We then ask the first initiater to summarize the subject, and with the help of the others, make it agreeable. The process is called "refining a [[SO]]" . | ||
Some times one subject is related to another subject. So we can move between subjects. We have to write them down and summarize each agreeable point. | Some times one subject is related to another subject. So we can move between subjects. We have to write them down and summarize each agreeable point. | ||
| − | + | To be able to look for the [[MO]]s in the discussion, one need to be a very experienced facilitator. but when a simple discussion is taken place an inexperienced facilitator can handle it. | |
It is very important to simulate the talk on a board. Preferably, white-board. The Symboles will be with mind maps but with clear sentences. | It is very important to simulate the talk on a board. Preferably, white-board. The Symboles will be with mind maps but with clear sentences. | ||
[[category: deliberation]] | [[category: deliberation]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:07, 10 January 2013
 This page was writen by a non-English speeking writer. Please help us improve the quality of the paper.Tal Yaron 19:07, 30 December 2012 (IST) |
Starting a discussion
When we start a discussion we start with a goal or a question. On the right side (in RTL languages) there is the goal. On the left side, there is the question, who do we achieve the goal.
We then further start to ask questions about the goal.
we then let the people try to explore the question and reach an agreement.
Talking points over ( epistemic-socializing MOs)
First talk a point over untill we have silence, or coll-down. We then ask the first initiater to summarize the subject, and with the help of the others, make it agreeable. The process is called "refining a SO" .
Some times one subject is related to another subject. So we can move between subjects. We have to write them down and summarize each agreeable point.
To be able to look for the MOs in the discussion, one need to be a very experienced facilitator. but when a simple discussion is taken place an inexperienced facilitator can handle it.
It is very important to simulate the talk on a board. Preferably, white-board. The Symboles will be with mind maps but with clear sentences.