Difference between revisions of "Medium in decision making"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(Created page with "A medium of communication can influence a lot upon the decision-making process. For instance, when using the air as a medium (face to face meetings), only one person can talk...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | A medium of communication can influence a lot upon the decision-making process. For instance, when using the air as a medium (face to face meetings), only one person can talk at a time simultaneously, otherwise, the members will have trouble hearing each other. The limitation may slow down | + | A medium of communication can influence a lot upon the decision-making process. For instance, when using the air as a medium (face to face meetings), only one person can talk at a time simultaneously, otherwise, the members will have trouble hearing each other. The limitation may [[The problem of coordination|slow down decision-making process when groups using face to face trying to negotiate]]. |
On the other hand, face to faca meetings can pass very effectively non-verbal communication, and therefore help the communication be more precise. | On the other hand, face to faca meetings can pass very effectively non-verbal communication, and therefore help the communication be more precise. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:41, 7 October 2018
A medium of communication can influence a lot upon the decision-making process. For instance, when using the air as a medium (face to face meetings), only one person can talk at a time simultaneously, otherwise, the members will have trouble hearing each other. The limitation may slow down decision-making process when groups using face to face trying to negotiate.
On the other hand, face to faca meetings can pass very effectively non-verbal communication, and therefore help the communication be more precise.