Difference between revisions of "Processes of deliberation"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub|[[User:WinSysop|Tal Yaron]] 12:32, 25 June 2014 (IDT)}} | {{stub|[[User:WinSysop|Tal Yaron]] 12:32, 25 June 2014 (IDT)}} | ||
| − | A group, like the individuals, will research in deliberation several aspects concerning the field in question. A group will research the field of knowledge ([[SON]]), the [[option|options]], their [[consequence|consequences], and the [[value|values]]. | + | A group, like the individuals, will research in deliberation several aspects concerning the field in question. A group will research the field of knowledge ([[SON]]), the [[option|options]], their [[consequence|consequences]], and the [[value|values]]. |
==Raising the Need for Deliberation== | ==Raising the Need for Deliberation== | ||
Latest revision as of 06:49, 3 July 2014
 This page is a stub. It is not ready for publication and is used to aggregate information about a subject. You can add further reading and add information to the page. If you want to prepare this page for publication please consults with the creator of this page. |
A group, like the individuals, will research in deliberation several aspects concerning the field in question. A group will research the field of knowledge (SON), the options, their consequences, and the values.
Contents
Raising the Need for Deliberation
The need to deliberate, usually results from the need to control. People need to control their life (Maslow-1). People who leave in a society, need to coordinate with others, in order to fulfill their need of control. If no body bother nobody else, and good social life exists, a calm deliberation will happen (based on curiosity-CFI). But if some ideas and actions will cause conflict between individuals or groups, a need to over come this conflict will arise. In militant societies, most members will prefer using force to solve the problem. But if force doesn't work, people will prefer to deliberate in order to find a solution to this problem. In more liberal societies, people will have the habit of solving conflicts by deliberation.
Therefore we may say that social conflict, which was put under check, may increase the need for deliberation.
Another reason for deliberation, is a common curiosity about shared unexplained phenomena. Such curiosity may be the cause of scientific deliberation.
Learning
Want for learning may increase, as a feeling of curiosity is induced to the participants, at the begging of the deliberation, or before any learning phase.
Self Learning
Highly Corroborated Learning (experts knowledge)
Creating Solutions, Evaluating and Synthesizing
Creating
Synthesizing
Evaluating
See MCDA and advanced MCDA[1][2] for multiple choices evaluation.