Difference between revisions of "Groups dynamics"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[Conspicuous consumption]] | [[Conspicuous consumption]] | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[managers|Managers]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[organizational politics|Organizational politics]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[group behavior]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_research Action research] - research on group collective action | ||
| + | |||
| + | To give the workers the silence to create as they want, [[managers]] use to handle politics in the background, without the workers attention. But this habit has flows. To be able to decide, workers need to understand the decision making system in the group. So they [[gossip]] to understand. And because gossip is also used for collations struggle, the information in the gossip-network tends to skew for slanders. This causes the organization to be perceived as having bad politics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | To solve it, I suggest that a better communication between the partners should be developed. Better understanding of how people can cooperate. This should be a quest for better communication within organization. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
==Group Spontenious Gatherings== | ==Group Spontenious Gatherings== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 40: | ||
# Small highly effective Cabal leadership, the synchronize the group, without it's members noticing. | # Small highly effective Cabal leadership, the synchronize the group, without it's members noticing. | ||
#* J14 - Amnon Dafni. | #* J14 - Amnon Dafni. | ||
| + | |||
| + | social media in uprasings: http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2014/01/18/if-you-doubt-that-social-media-has-changed-the-world-take-a-look-at-ukraine/ | ||
[[category: groups]] | [[category: groups]] | ||
Latest revision as of 04:07, 15 June 2015
psychology settings for deliberation
Action research - research on group collective action
To give the workers the silence to create as they want, managers use to handle politics in the background, without the workers attention. But this habit has flows. To be able to decide, workers need to understand the decision making system in the group. So they gossip to understand. And because gossip is also used for collations struggle, the information in the gossip-network tends to skew for slanders. This causes the organization to be perceived as having bad politics.
To solve it, I suggest that a better communication between the partners should be developed. Better understanding of how people can cooperate. This should be a quest for better communication within organization.
Group Spontenious Gatherings
In many group spontenious gatherings, I have seen some coomen fetutres.
- a sweel of needs
- J14 - houses cost
- Hasdna le Idea Tziburi - unreponsive government.
- A very simple action which is nice to follow
- Hasdna le Idea Tziburi
- Dancing lessons.
- J14 - tents
- A good friendly feelings
- J14
- Hasdna le Idea Tziburi
- High purpose
- Small highly effective Cabal leadership, the synchronize the group, without it's members noticing.
- J14 - Amnon Dafni.
social media in uprasings: http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2014/01/18/if-you-doubt-that-social-media-has-changed-the-world-take-a-look-at-ukraine/