Actions

Difference between revisions of "Ignorance"

From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki

(Created page with "Feeling of Knowledge. unsculful people tend to overestimate their knowledge<ref> Kruger, Justin; David Dunning (1999). "Unskilled and Unaware of It: ...")
 
(Dunning–Kruger effect)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Feeling of Knowledge.
 
Feeling of Knowledge.
  
unsculful people tend to overestimate their knowledge<ref> Kruger, Justin; David Dunning (1999). "[[feeling of knowledge|Unskilled and Unaware of It]]: [http://www.psoriasissociety.ttsg.org/pdfs/Dunning-Kruger%20Effect.pdf How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments]". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–34.</ref><ref>Kennedy, Ellen J., Leigh Lawton, and E. Leroy Plumlee. "Blissful ignorance: The problem of unrecognized incompetence and academic performance." Journal of Marketing Education 24.3 (2002): 243-252.‏</ref><ref>Dunning, David, et al. "Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence." Current Directions in Psychological Science 12.3 (2003): 83-87.‏</ref><ref>Dunning, David, Chip Heath, and Jerry M. Suls. "Flawed self-assessment implications for health, education, and the workplace." Psychological science in the public interest 5.3 (2004): 69-106.‏</ref>
+
Unskilled people tend to overestimate their knowledge<ref> Kruger, Justin; David Dunning (1999). "[[feeling of knowledge|Unskilled and Unaware of It]]: [http://www.psoriasissociety.ttsg.org/pdfs/Dunning-Kruger%20Effect.pdf How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments]". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–34.</ref><ref>Kennedy, Ellen J., Leigh Lawton, and E. Leroy Plumlee. "Blissful ignorance: The problem of unrecognized incompetence and academic performance." Journal of Marketing Education 24.3 (2002): 243-252.‏</ref><ref>Dunning, David, et al. "Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence." Current Directions in Psychological Science 12.3 (2003): 83-87.‏</ref><ref>Dunning, David, Chip Heath, and Jerry M. Suls. "Flawed self-assessment implications for health, education, and the workplace." Psychological science in the public interest 5.3 (2004): 69-106.‏</ref>. A deliberation based on poor knowledge was named "low information rationality" by Popkin<ref>Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press.</ref>. There are cultural diffrence in overconfidence<ref>[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597897926960 General Knowledge Overconfidence: Cross-National Variations, Response Style, and “Reality”]</ref>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Dunning–Kruger effect==
 +
The [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect Dunning–Kruger effect] is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with low ability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competence accurately. Their research also suggests corollaries: high-ability individuals may underestimate their relative competence and may erroneously assume that tasks which are easy for them are also easy for others.[1]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
 +
[[category: Attitude change]]
 +
[[category: decision making]]
 +
[[category: Definitions]]
 +
[[category: Learning‏]]

Latest revision as of 01:18, 13 April 2017

Feeling of Knowledge.

Unskilled people tend to overestimate their knowledge[1][2][3][4]. A deliberation based on poor knowledge was named "low information rationality" by Popkin[5]. There are cultural diffrence in overconfidence[6]


Dunning–Kruger effect

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with low ability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competence accurately. Their research also suggests corollaries: high-ability individuals may underestimate their relative competence and may erroneously assume that tasks which are easy for them are also easy for others.[1]

References

  1. Kruger, Justin; David Dunning (1999). "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–34.
  2. Kennedy, Ellen J., Leigh Lawton, and E. Leroy Plumlee. "Blissful ignorance: The problem of unrecognized incompetence and academic performance." Journal of Marketing Education 24.3 (2002): 243-252.‏
  3. Dunning, David, et al. "Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence." Current Directions in Psychological Science 12.3 (2003): 83-87.‏
  4. Dunning, David, Chip Heath, and Jerry M. Suls. "Flawed self-assessment implications for health, education, and the workplace." Psychological science in the public interest 5.3 (2004): 69-106.‏
  5. Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press.
  6. General Knowledge Overconfidence: Cross-National Variations, Response Style, and “Reality”