Difference between revisions of "Radicals"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(Created page with "Radicals may use more the FFFF mechanism. By using dialog on the core issues of beliefs and theory along restraints of force, one can promote [http://www.ict.org.il/Porta...") |
(→More) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
By using dialog on the core issues of beliefs and theory along restraints of force, one can promote [http://www.ict.org.il/Portals/0/Internet%20Monitoring%20Group/JWMG_De_Radicalization_LIFG.pdf un-radicalization]. The talks about the core ideas can help radical understand the world, and engage in a more peacful solutions. | By using dialog on the core issues of beliefs and theory along restraints of force, one can promote [http://www.ict.org.il/Portals/0/Internet%20Monitoring%20Group/JWMG_De_Radicalization_LIFG.pdf un-radicalization]. The talks about the core ideas can help radical understand the world, and engage in a more peacful solutions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==More Knowledge== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In a research which I can not locate, it was found that radicals has more knowledge on the subject then modrate people. This with the assumption that we tend to defend our worldview<ref>Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion [Kindle Edition] (p. 530). Penguin.</ref>,may imply that radicals use knowledge and auxilury thoeries to to defend their views. This may also be the results of radicals being more afraid, and so use rationalization to make the world more explainable and safe. | ||
| + | |||
| + | What may be the implication of the above theory (if it is true)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==More== | ||
| + | The Arab and Muslim current culture is usually radical, and there fore will suffer from ''[[the radicals paradox]]'' which will make them [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-26634679 ungovernable] and dictatorial. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A look at Isalamic State by vice ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUjHb4C7b94 YouTube video]). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
[[category: psychology]] | [[category: psychology]] | ||
[[category:groups]] | [[category:groups]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:05, 20 August 2014
Radicals may use more the FFFF mechanism.
By using dialog on the core issues of beliefs and theory along restraints of force, one can promote un-radicalization. The talks about the core ideas can help radical understand the world, and engage in a more peacful solutions.
More Knowledge
In a research which I can not locate, it was found that radicals has more knowledge on the subject then modrate people. This with the assumption that we tend to defend our worldview[1],may imply that radicals use knowledge and auxilury thoeries to to defend their views. This may also be the results of radicals being more afraid, and so use rationalization to make the world more explainable and safe.
What may be the implication of the above theory (if it is true)?
More
The Arab and Muslim current culture is usually radical, and there fore will suffer from the radicals paradox which will make them ungovernable and dictatorial.
A look at Isalamic State by vice (YouTube video).
References
- ↑ Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion [Kindle Edition] (p. 530). Penguin.