Difference between revisions of "Online deliberation"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(→Tools for online deliberation) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | In order for a technology to be adopted, it is necessary that the perceived benefits are higher than the costs deriving from its use<ref>Davis, F. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.</ref><ref>Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186-204.</ref>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[argument mapping tools]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Tools for online deliberation== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://civicevolution.org PublicEvolution] intresting site for mass participation. | ||
| + | * [http://participatedb.com/tools?page=2 list of online tools] | ||
| + | * [http://www.delib.net/apps Delib: Super-simple apps for deliberative democracy] | ||
| + | * [https://settleit.org/ Settleit] - A tool to validate the claims and their | ||
| + | * [http://incoma.org Incoma] - An [[argument mapping tools|AMT]] deliberative tool. | ||
| + | * [http://debatewise.org/ Debatewise] - wikidebate. | ||
| + | * [http://events.kmi.open.ac.uk/essence/tools/ debate tools], by the open university in united kingdum. | ||
| + | |||
==Readings== | ==Readings== | ||
| Line 4: | Line 18: | ||
[http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2012/02/07/new-research-paper-presents-30-general-design-considerations-for-online-deliberation-systems/ Intellitics, New Research Paper Presents 30 General Design Considerations for Online Deliberation Systems (2012)] | [http://www.intellitics.com/blog/2012/02/07/new-research-paper-presents-30-general-design-considerations-for-online-deliberation-systems/ Intellitics, New Research Paper Presents 30 General Design Considerations for Online Deliberation Systems (2012)] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www.debiki.com/-9qb49-solving-problem-first-comment-gets-all-upvotes#.UU8R81tgYp8 Solving the problem that the topmost comments get all upvotes] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
[[category: deliberation]] | [[category: deliberation]] | ||
Latest revision as of 00:03, 28 July 2014
In order for a technology to be adopted, it is necessary that the perceived benefits are higher than the costs deriving from its use[1][2].
Tools for online deliberation
- PublicEvolution intresting site for mass participation.
- list of online tools
- Delib: Super-simple apps for deliberative democracy
- Settleit - A tool to validate the claims and their
- Incoma - An AMT deliberative tool.
- Debatewise - wikidebate.
- debate tools, by the open university in united kingdum.
Readings
Todd Davies and Reid Chandler, Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence (2011)
Solving the problem that the topmost comments get all upvotes
References
- ↑ Davis, F. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
- ↑ Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186-204.