Difference between revisions of "Online deliberation"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(→Tools for online deliberation) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | In order for a technology to be adopted, it is necessary that the perceived benefits are higher than the costs deriving from its use<ref>Davis, F. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.</ref><ref>Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186-204.</ref>. | ||
| + | |||
==Tools for online deliberation== | ==Tools for online deliberation== | ||
Revision as of 23:59, 27 July 2014
In order for a technology to be adopted, it is necessary that the perceived benefits are higher than the costs deriving from its use[1][2].
Tools for online deliberation
- PublicEvolution intresting site for mass participation.
- list of online tools
- Delib: Super-simple apps for deliberative democracy
- Settleit - A tool to validate the claims and their
- Incoma - s SODM deliberative tool.
Readings
Todd Davies and Reid Chandler, Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence (2011)
Solving the problem that the topmost comments get all upvotes- ↑ Davis, F. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
- ↑ Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186-204.