Difference between revisions of "Conservatives and Liberals"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
(→Causes of Lib-Con) |
(→Causes of Lib-Con) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
** alcohol intoxication<ref>Webster, D. M. (1994). Groups under the influence: Need for closure effects on the use of shared and unique information. Unpublished | ** alcohol intoxication<ref>Webster, D. M. (1994). Groups under the influence: Need for closure effects on the use of shared and unique information. Unpublished | ||
doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.</ref> | doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.</ref> | ||
| − | + | * Low need for cognition | |
| − | + | * Need for closure in highly intelligent people (logical people) will cause ....I am not sure.... | |
| − | |||
==Further readings== | ==Further readings== | ||
Revision as of 04:21, 16 August 2012
Conservatism and Liberalism is a wide phenomena which presnt itslef in very divers areas of social life. It is well knowen that there are some who behave in a conservative way, and some in liberal way. Although it is well knowen phenomena, it was hard to charctrized precisly the properties of liberals and conservatives, and it is stil not very well established, what are the causes of liberalism and conservatism.
In this papae I will make an effort to give a coherent view of the cartrization of the lib-con phenomena, and will try to give also a coherent mechnism for the causes of lib-con, based on recent years research in psychology and neurocognitive.
Contents
Letriture review
Charectristics of Lib-Con
Liberalism and conservatism (LibCon) is a phrsae taken form the political scene, but it may apply to commerce, fashion and other social attitudes. In commerce, liberals, or early adopters, are people who tend to buy the newst products, while conservatives look for well tested products, who are old-fashiond[1]. Although the phenomena is well knowen, It's cahrectarisitc are buffleing. A well knowen attempt to the phenomena was done by Lakoff[2]. Lakoff put liberals on the carring and empathic moral and the conservatives on the strong moral, which divide the world in to good and evil.
The charectaristics of conservatives[3]
Causes of Lib-Con
Conservatives are more fearful, while liberals are more calm[4]. Conservatives percives thetening faces as more threatning[5].
There is a connection between liberalism and intelegence[6].
conservatism can be caused by:
- FFFF
- Important of actions and time presure, which sustaning information can be too costly[7][8][9][10][11][12]
- Low need for cognition
- Need for closure in highly intelligent people (logical people) will cause ....I am not sure....
Further readings
References
- ↑ Rogers Everett M., 1962,Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press of Glencoe, Macmillan Company
- ↑ Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals In the Dust ,George Lakoff, 1995
- ↑ Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition, Jost et al. Psychological Bulletin, 2003, Vol. 129, No. 3, 339–375
- ↑ Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits, 2008, Hibbing et al. Science (Hebrew summery)
- ↑ JM. Vigil (2008) Facial Expression Processing Varies with Political Affiliation, Nature
- ↑ The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind Dana R. Carney, John T. Jost, Samuel D. Gosling3, Jeff Potter4, Political Psychology, Volume 29, Issue 6, pages 807–840, December 2008
- ↑ A Dynamic and Stochastic Theory of Choice, Response Time, and Confidence (review in Hebrew)
- ↑ A paper about time and change of attitude for learning
- ↑ Author, 1990 , Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making
- ↑ *Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Simon, L. (1999). Effects of epistemic motivation on conservatism, intolerance, and other system justifying attitudes. In L. Thompson, D. M. Messick, & J. M. Levine (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp.91–116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- ↑ Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19,448–468.
- ↑ Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1998). Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 383–393.
- ↑ Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.” Psychological Review, 103, 263–283.
- ↑ Webster, D. M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 181–195.
- ↑ Webster, D. M. (1994). Groups under the influence: Need for closure effects on the use of shared and unique information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.