Difference between revisions of "Curiosity"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Exploratory behaviour will start without any stimulus<ref>Brown, Judson S. "Problems presented by the concept of acquired drives." (1953).</ref>. | Exploratory behaviour will start without any stimulus<ref>Brown, Judson S. "Problems presented by the concept of acquired drives." (1953).</ref>. | ||
| − | The need to learn new thing is constantly working, and when there isn't any new stimuly, we are bored. So we constantly looking for new stimulations<ref>Dember, William N., and Robert W. Earl. "Analysis of exploratory, manipulatory, and curiosity behaviors." Psychological review 64.2 (1957): 91.</ref><ref>Fowler, Harry, and Melvin H. Marx. Curiosity and exploratory behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1965.</ref> | + | The need to learn new thing is constantly working, and when there isn't any new stimuly, we are bored. So we constantly looking for new stimulations<ref>Dember, William N., and Robert W. Earl. "Analysis of exploratory, manipulatory, and curiosity behaviors." Psychological review 64.2 (1957): 91.</ref><ref>Fowler, Harry, and Melvin H. Marx. Curiosity and exploratory behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1965.</ref> <ref>learning theory, personality theory and and clinical research ''in Kintucy simposium (Vol 9. pp 36- 53) Oxford, Willy</ref><ref>[http://www.todmanpsychology.org/resources/Drives%20and%20the%20CNS%20(Hebb,%201955).pdf Hebb, Donald Olding. "Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system)." Psychological review 62.4 (1955): 243.]</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | '''knowledge gap'': | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Loewenstein (1994) suggests that when individuals encounter novel, complex, or ambiguous stimuli, they may find there are discrepancies between information that is known and unknown—indicative of a “knowledge gap”.The perceived magnitude of such gaps are based on feeling-of-knowing (FOK) judgements, which are metacognitive estimates of one’s available (i.e.,retrievable) knowledge (Brown & McNeil], 1966; Eysenck, 1979; I-Iart, 1965).According to Loewenstein (1994), stronger FOI(s correspond with smaller perceived knowledge gaps, and result in feeling closer to figuring or finding out the desired knowledge (Loewenstein, 1994; Loewenstein, Adler, Behrens, & Gillis, I992). Based on Miller’s (1959) approach-gradient theory, which predicts that the intensity of motives increase as one approaches goal achievement,Loewenstein (I994) hypothesises that as FOI(s become stronger, knowledge gaps will seem smaller, and states of curiosity will intensify as individuals | ||
| + | perceive themselves close to eliminating their knowledge discrepancy and the associated feelings of tension. In one study, Loewenstein et al. (1992) asked."<ref>Litman, Jordan. "Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information." Cognition & emotion 19.6 (2005): 793-814.</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 02:14, 16 January 2014
Questions that were rated as more puzzeling, were remeberd more[1]
Exploratory behaviour will start without any stimulus[2].
The need to learn new thing is constantly working, and when there isn't any new stimuly, we are bored. So we constantly looking for new stimulations[3][4] [5][6]
'knowledge gap:
- Loewenstein (1994) suggests that when individuals encounter novel, complex, or ambiguous stimuli, they may find there are discrepancies between information that is known and unknown—indicative of a “knowledge gap”.The perceived magnitude of such gaps are based on feeling-of-knowing (FOK) judgements, which are metacognitive estimates of one’s available (i.e.,retrievable) knowledge (Brown & McNeil], 1966; Eysenck, 1979; I-Iart, 1965).According to Loewenstein (1994), stronger FOI(s correspond with smaller perceived knowledge gaps, and result in feeling closer to figuring or finding out the desired knowledge (Loewenstein, 1994; Loewenstein, Adler, Behrens, & Gillis, I992). Based on Miller’s (1959) approach-gradient theory, which predicts that the intensity of motives increase as one approaches goal achievement,Loewenstein (I994) hypothesises that as FOI(s become stronger, knowledge gaps will seem smaller, and states of curiosity will intensify as individuals
perceive themselves close to eliminating their knowledge discrepancy and the associated feelings of tension. In one study, Loewenstein et al. (1992) asked."[7]
References
- ↑ Berlyne, Daniel E. "A theory of human curiosity." British Journal of Psychology. General Section 45.3 (1954): 180-191.
- ↑ Brown, Judson S. "Problems presented by the concept of acquired drives." (1953).
- ↑ Dember, William N., and Robert W. Earl. "Analysis of exploratory, manipulatory, and curiosity behaviors." Psychological review 64.2 (1957): 91.
- ↑ Fowler, Harry, and Melvin H. Marx. Curiosity and exploratory behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1965.
- ↑ learning theory, personality theory and and clinical research in Kintucy simposium (Vol 9. pp 36- 53) Oxford, Willy
- ↑ Hebb, Donald Olding. "Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system)." Psychological review 62.4 (1955): 243.
- ↑ Litman, Jordan. "Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information." Cognition & emotion 19.6 (2005): 793-814.