3,078
edits
Changes
no edit summary
{{en|[[User:WinSysop|Tal Yaron]] 01:32, 11 January 2013 (IST)}}
On the most natural terms, a decision making system is evaluated based on it's ability to direct the best effective actions that will produce maximum ROI (Return Of Investment) for the person who evaluate the system. when we calculate investment, the efforts put into the decision system is also calculated. If the system is demands high investment of resources to achieve effective solutions, it over all evaluation will decrees. This This actual evaluation is described can change from person to person. some will have more of a need to a clear and simple decision making process (usually conservatives and action driven personalities) others may want a more complex and subtle and participatory decision making, due to their need to explore and experience before omitting to actions (these will be usually liberals and especially people with ADD). A more complex account of the benefits and investment are describe in detailed in the "[[Participation function|participation function]]"". When a a group is trying to decide the legitimacy of decision system, it will evaluate it according to the ability of the system to benefit individuals and coalitions to influence in the group members.
For instance, if a minority-elite members will feel that the decision that was taken by the state decision systems produce for the conditions that cause their ROI to be smaller then they could achieve if they have a state of their own, or if they feel that their ROI is negative, they will try to influence the decision making process,and if they will fill that they are unable to influance it, they will delegitimize the state's systems of decision making, in the eyes of the minority members.