3,078
edits
Changes
→Justification of Deliberation
The legitimecy of a system of deliberation and [[decision making]], dependnd on it's efficiancy. A good system will be a one that need low resources by the citizens and yeald decisions that enable larger parts of the populations flurish.
Deliberation systems have three main functions, according to the the writers of Deliberative systems<ref>Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. (Eds.). (2012). Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (p. 204). Cambridge University Press. p.10-12</ref>. The three are # '''Epistemic''' - Good deliberation should produce well corroborated and inter-subjective [[SON]]. It should produced unbiased, and eliminate as much as possible [[group thinking]]. The decision by the citizens will be well informed.# '''Ethic'' ' - Good deliberation will take the needs of all members and will produce optimal inclusive solutions.# '''Democratic''' - People will engage shared challenges, will think on other citizens conflicts and world view, and will be responsible for the acts taken by the state. On This will make the epistemic considerationcitizens influential, It should produce well informed decisions. In involved and responsible, and will strength the ethic side, deliberation creates more bonding between citizensmutual bonds. In the democratic perspective deliberation should take into account inputs from wider prompt opinions of the population, when making decisionsIt will strive to get as much inclusive solution so that everybody will feel that he is been concerned as important and equal citizen.
===On using Experts in Deliberation===