'''==Definition of deliberation:'''==

* If people need to use the common resource or take coordinated collaborative action, they will need to achieve a single option or several options that do not contradict each other.Deliberation consume consumes resources (Time, thinking, meeting-places, etc.), and may take a lot of resources. We may reduce resource consumption by developing more efficient processes.If people need to resolve disagreement and the deliberation wouldn’t produce a solution, by the available resources, they can take other means of decision making, like voting, sortition, or decision by minority or a single person. Yet these methods sometime sometimes may harm the interests of some the people and therefore may result in an unwillingness to cooperate or even the resist the resolution. Even in such circumstances, setting some time and resources to deliberation may result in a decision that may elevate the will to cooperate.  Deliberation is affected by the medium which is used during the process. It is also affected by social, cognitional, and emotional phenomena. ==delibration-action cycle definition==The purpose of deliberation is to help a group coordinate, according to [[Values of deliberative-democracy|deliberative values]]. Deliberation creates social object networks ([[SON]]), which help the group communicate with clarity. Coordination can be about setting rules of how to use a common resource (non-interference) or working in coordination or aggregation to achieve some common goal (active collaboration). All knowledge of the social object network is under the falsification criterion, therefore all knowledge should be falsified, tested, and corroborated. The group should produce in time a corroborated knowledge, which will help the members decide together, produce and choose better options together.  The second purpose of liberation is to find the best option which the group should take. If a common issue arises, all the members can suggest options for solutions, and help each other improve options. According to deliberation values, options will be evaluated and selected according to the [[Personal Optimising ROI Selection Criterion|optimal personal good principle]].The members should act according to the decisions, and produce soft measures which will motivate members to follow the decisions (reaching consensus, removing from the group, etc.).  The members will be able to investigate the actions and learn from them. They will be able to suggest new solutions to the issue or reframe the issue.This cycle of SON-deliberation-options-evaluation+improvment-selection-action-learning should improve the ROI of the members according to the optimal personal good, with time and cycles.