I propose that every deliberation starts with a [[need]]. Deliberation is a costly mechanism to facilitate communal life. We will usually avoid equal deliberation, unless we have some need that is not addressed by the current practices and laws our society currently holds. The need to deliberate arises when people in a society feels that there is a problem fulfilling some need or needs, and that collective action is needed for addressing the needs. If will not address the needs for the members, when some solution we will suggest later on will hurt the needs of some members, they will resist to the new solution. Therefore, in a deliberation we should try and understand the needs of the group, in order to address them better. Understanding the needs help us find solutions for the needs of all members, or at list take them all the needs into account.

Every member of a group [[MON|has her own unique understanding and perceptions about the world]]. For every need the group will try address, every member has her own understanding on how to fulfill this need. When If we will ask for solutions, the number of solutions and understanding of the problem will be very large. Therefore, when we try to solve a problem, we have to find ways to include all world views held by participants. We can try doing to do it by taking into account all various thoughts and understandings, but then we cannot body of knowledge we will have to deal with, will be very big. To solve this problem of overwhelming understandings, is to create a common field of knowledge. For [[Epistemology|epistemic reasons]], I will call it Social Objects Network or [[SON]] for the acronym. The process of creating SON, is critical for common decision-making. The group should create a SON in order to understand each otherand estimate togther what will be the best options. We could not criticize or understand (to explain more)The process of creating SON is done by critical thinking, challenging group previous consumptions etc.