3,078
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Jazvic said (look at Kahnman p. 67)that new experience is danger, and therefore, human an animals will avoid new exprience: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mere-exposure_effect mere-exprience effect]. (especially if FFFF is working....)
==Paper==
===The question===
Deliberate democracy aims at involving civilians in rational-communication which will help the members change their minds according to reliable information and chose together the most suitable solution. Yet we know that large proportion of the population is conservative, and according to research resists change in world view. This conflict between large scale participation in deliberative democracy and the resistance of substantial portion of the population to change is a challenge deliberative democracy developers need to address.
I suggest that if we will understand what are the mechanisms of resistance to change on the neurocognitive, psychological and social levels, we will be better able to create deliberation settings that will advance change in participants mind according to the information that was produced in the intersubjective experience of deliberation. In this paper I will focus on the neurocognitive mechanisms of rigidity and according to these mechanisms, I will suggest some basic settings which will promote more flexible in participants mind. thinking by the participants of the deliberation process.
==Letriture review==
===Charectristics of Lib-Con===