3,078
edits
Changes
→Conservative Society
Conservatives show more anger towards criminals<ref>Fodor, Wick, Hartsen, & Preve, 2008</ref>. Conservatives are more happey due to social conformation<ref>Schlenker, Barry R., John R. Chambers, and Bonnie M. Le. "Conservatives are happier than liberals, but why? Political ideology, personality, and life satisfaction." Journal of Research in Personality 46.2 (2012): 127-146.</ref>
==environmental causes for conservatism and liberalism==
Conservatism and liberalism as reactions to environmental states.
Based on Haidt finding I suggest that liberalism and conservatism are reactions to environmental state. Haidt found that liberal and conservatives differ in their attitude toward six typical values. I'll suggest that these differences of attitude may stem reactions to different environmental situations. Liberalism may stem from a reaction to safe and abundant environment while conservatism may be a reaction to dangerous environment which is scarce of resources.
The idea that creatures tend to react with different strategies to different environmental situations is not new. In ecology it is known that in organisms react to a harsh or safe environment with two different strategies of breeding: one is the r selection and the other is k selection. R selection is a strategy suited for an environment which is dangerous and has scarce resources. In this strategy, creatures tend to give birth to many offsprings and they tend to give them minimal resources in their nurture. In such way, some of the offsprings may survive the harsh conditions and the dangers. But when the environment is safer and there are more resources, creatures tend to have less offsprings and they tend to give each of them much more care and resources while nurturing them.
It seems that that r and k strategies, also apply to breeding patterns in humane societies. Liberal societies tend to sustain a lower birth ratio compared to conservative societies.
While r and k selection is well documented strategies for birth, I'll suggest that conservatism and liberalism are two strategies for handling common resources by groups and individuals: conservatism is a strategy fit for danger and limited resources while liberalism is used for safe surroundings and abundance of resources.
Conservatism and liberalism seems to have the properties of r and k selection. Jonathan Haidt found the conservatives and liberals differ in evaluation of six values. The values are loyalty, respect for authority, fairness, sexuality, defend from harm and liberty. Liberals tend to value loyalty and authority less then conservatives. Liberals tend to have a less strict need for controlling the sexuality of women. Conservatives tend to legitimize punishment of insubordinate individuals and groups, while liberals tend to defend the unorthodox. Conservatives see fairness as a reward for an investment, while liberals tend to share more resources and distribute them more evenly, regardless of one's investment. And of course, liberals tend to value liberty in the face of society more then conservatives does.
I suggest that these values relate to environmental situations I mentioned earlier. So the need for discipline, to subject to the group and obedience to authority, is required to allow the group to organize in the face of external danger.
The value of fairness that getting resources correlated to the investment you put in, stems from the need to encourage people to work in an environment where resources are scarce. On the other hand, in a state of abundance, where there is plenty to go around, there is no need to work hard to obtain resources. In this case people can share more resources, and avoid conflicts.
==high levels proposed causes of liberalism and conservatism==