Unlike Kuhn, Cappella et al., do not try to include ''genuine evidence '' in support of reasons as a part of the evaluation of argument repertoire, nor do we they attempt to ascertain the ''coherence among multiple reasons '' (e.g., Tetlock, 1989<ref>Tetlock, P. (1989). Structure and function in political belief systems. In A. Pratkanis, S. Breckler, & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.</ref>). Both dimensions are plausible components of argument repertoire. However, we they want to employ our measure in a survey context. ''Coherence'' (or integrative complexity) requires at least two arguments plus elaboration. In the current application, we have ignored integrative complexity.