3,078
edits
Changes
Created page with " Gastil and Black 2008 suggested five bulding blocks <ref>[http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol4/iss1/art3 Gastil, J., & Black, L. W. (2008). Pub..."
[[Gastil and Black framework|Gastil and Black 2008]] suggested five bulding blocks <ref>[http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol4/iss1/art3 Gastil, J., & Black, L. W. (2008). Public deliberation as the organizing principle in political communication research. Journal of Public Deliberation, 4.]</ref>:
#Creating an information base (SON).
#Prioritizing key values at stake (pre-Evaluation)
#Identifing wide range of possible solutions (Options)
#Weighing the solutions (Evaluation)
#Making the best decision possible (selecting)
They base their model of group decision making resesrch<ref>Hirokawa, R. Y., & Salazar, A. J. (1999). Task-group communication and decisionmaking performance. In L. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole, (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 167-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.</ref><ref>Hollingshead, A. N., Wittenbaum, G. M., Paulus, P. B., Hirowaka, R. Y., Ancona,
D. G., Peterson, R. S., . . . Yoon, K. (2005). A look at groups from the functional perspective. In M. S. Poole & A. B Hollingshead (Eds.), Theories of small groups: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 21-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.</ref>.
[[Gastil and Black framwork]] gives four aspects of socilogy of deliberation:
#All participants should have equal and adequate speaking opportunities.
#All participants should attempt to comprehend one another’s views.
#All participants should make efforts to fully consider each other’s input.
#All participants should demonstrate respect for each other.
[[Category: deliberation]]
[[category:framework]]