Open main menu

Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki β

Changes

Deliberation

293 bytes added, 00:15, 11 February 2014
Layers of Coordination
# [[Values]] - Values are the way we evaluate the outcome of our decisions. For instance, some may evaluate "The bottom line (monetary gains)", while other may evaluate the well-being of the workers and customers. Those two different values may create disagreement about the preferred [[options]] that should be taken.
# [[Interests]] - Any outcome from the [[options]] that the group may take, may harm or gain any one of her members (or the community that the group serve). So members will try to evaluate the gains and harms and will search for the best option that will serve their interests. Many times members will try to use "[[hidden agenda|hidden agendas]]" discourse to divert the options taken to achieve selfish interests. Therefore deliberation experts say it is important to know each member interests and put them on the open so no hidden agendas will subvert the decision.
 
===Metaconsensus===
Dryzek and mm think that meta consensus should be gained based on how to conduct the deliberation process.<ref>Dryzek, John S. and Simon J. Niemeyer. 2006. Reconciling pluralism and consensus a spolitical ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 634–49.</ref>
==Systematic Approach To Deliberation==