For the sake of economic usage of memory storage we will assume the simplest inductions between SPsDSPs. Yet, in the coming phenomena we may notice that the induction does not describe well the relation between the SPsDSPs. We might find that although we have the induction "smell_x always come with sound_y", we might notice that in the coming observations sound_y do not follow smell_x. This will cause refutation of the induction, and we will have to try to create a new induction or forget the refuted induction. If we want to suggest a more complex induction we may look at our stored relations between SPsDSPs, and see that when smell_x was not followed by sound_y, a touch-feeling_z did occur just before the appearance of smell_x. Therefore we may suggest the following induction " smell_x always come with sound_y unless touch-feeling_z occur just before smell_x".

From the sets of stored memory about SPs realtions of DSPs we may suggest many different inductions that may describe the occurence of SPsDSPs, but yet again for the sake of simplicityeconomical storage, it will be better to use the simplest induction possible to describe maximum observable SPsrelations between DSPs. This Process of suggesting induction, refutation refutatios and resuggesting a more complex induction, is a part of the continued process of creating knowledge.