The induction between two SPs DSPs might be very simple. They may be linked directly. For instance, a sound of a broken glass may be directly connected to a look of a braking glass, because the Neumann that creates these two specific SPsDSPs, is always affect the phenomena in the same pattern. But it can be connected in more complex ways, for instance the Neumann that creates these two SPs DSPs may be a computer that creates a breaking sound, whenever he creates a visual SP DSP of breaking glass. Because the Neumann can change its effect on SPsDSPs, the induction may describe well the relation between the SPs DSPs until sometimein the comming observations, and it may be not describe the relation in the future<ref>[http://www.amazon.com/Fact-Fiction-Forecast-Fourth-Edition/dp/0674290712 Goodman, N., & Putnam, H. (1983). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Fourth Edition (p. 160). Harvard University Press.]</ref>. The reason to choose the simplest induction is because the number of available possible relations between a sound and a breaking glass are infinite. Therefore for reasons of effective storage, we will use to use the '''simplest induction which is the minimum usage of information to describe maximum sets relations of SPsDSPs'''. In our case it might be ''"All breaking glasses has this specific sound"''.