Personal Optimising Optimizing ROI Selection Criterion Is the process criterion by which the different options are evaluated by the group's members.

Because deliberation is a liberal method of coordination the liberal values are set in order to help the group choose the best option. In liberal values, every person is a free person and he /she is free to associate himself with any other free person.

When in deliberation large amount of options are evaluated as a solution for a common issue, Some options may harm some of the individuals, While other individuals make a profit from those options. In conservative values, members may choose the "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_good common good]" principle as a method to select an option, Which means that on average most of the members profit even though a minority of members may lose.

==personal good prinicpalPersonal Good Principal==Under Upholding the principles of free choice and free association principles, the a group cannot ask compel a member to sacrifice herself their individual interests for the purported common good. Therefore another An alternative criterion is neededrequired. I'll suggest One approach could be that the individual should be remains a group member of the group and comply complies with the group decisions although she may lose in , even if the current decision if she evaluates that her own may result in a perceived personal [[ROI]] will be positive in the long run. If [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributive_justice distributed justice] is important to herloss, she should also provided they evaluate if the ROI she believes she will get will be distributed according to her preferences of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributive_justice#Types_of_distributive_norms type of distributed justice]. I believe that the type of distributed justice should be that which in the their long run will optimize my own -term personal return on investment (ROI) will be positive.

According to the The tit-for-tat theory posits that in such conditions under situations involving multiple games or iterations, members will try strive to select an option with options that maximize the return on investment (ROI) for the majority while minimizing adverse impacts on those who may experience losses. This approach aims to strike a balance between collective benefit and mitigating harm, which is best fostering cooperation and reciprocity over time. By adopting a long-term perspective and considering the interconnected nature of repeated interactions, members are incentivized to pursue decisions that yield positive outcomes for most membersstakeholders, thereby promoting stability and does minimal damage to those who lose from mutually beneficial outcomes within the selectiongroup dynamics.

Also according to However, the first principle theory also acknowledges that if a group will hurt consistently compromises an individual 's ROI too many times excessively, the individual will may choose to leave the group. Also, individuals will prefer Individuals are likely to gravitate towards groups that will reward them with higher ROIROIs, And therefore there will be leading to an evolution evolutionary process where groups that produce the best overall ROI outcomes for besttheir members become more attractive and sustainable over time. Ultimately, this dynamic creates a self-resulting ROI regulating system where groupsthat fail to balance collective and individual interests risk losing members to more rewarding alternatives. Conversely, groups that effectively maximize ROIs while minimizing harm to individuals are more likely to retain and attract members, fostering long-term success and cohesion within the group structure.==A group can exclude harming individuals, under restricted cinditionsconditions==In such casescertain scenarios, the an individual may enter join a group and may try with the intention of contributing minimally while seeking to contribute as little as they can, and profit as much as they canmaximize their personal gain. To prevent mitigate such behavior the , members can collectively decide to remove from individuals who are perceived as detrimental to the groupsgroup's interests. However, members which they think can hurt them. But removing the removal of members should be done carefullyapproached cautiously, especially in groups of [[comprising diverse stakeholders]]. Abruptly removing a member can create a foster rivalry between the groups and create a conflict between the groups, potentially escalating tensions.  Therefore , rather than resorting to immediate expulsion, it may be more prudent to engage individuals which perceived as harming the group harmful in a persuasive manner. The aim should be persuaded to be more aligned align their behaviors with the group's accepted distributed principles of distributive justice type , which is regarded as accepted are endorsed by the majority of members. Through open dialogue and a shared understanding of fairness, individuals can be encouraged to contribute more equitably and align their actions with the group's collective interests. This approach not only preserves group cohesion but also fosters an environment of inclusivity and mutual understanding. By embracing principles of distributive justice and employing persuasion over exclusion, groups can navigate potential conflicts more constructively, fostering cooperation and minimizing the risk of escalating rivalries or fracturing relationships among stakeholders.

During As group members engage in interactions that yield favorable returns on investment (ROI), trust within the interactions of group will be strengthened. When individuals experience positive outcomes from their collaborative efforts, they are more likely to place heightened confidence and faith in the group dynamic. This elevated trust encourages members to invest greater resources, time, and energy into group endeavors, as they perceive the collective efforts as trustworthy and beneficial. Consequently, a virtuous cycle emerges: successful interactions that generate desirable ROIs foster trust, which in for turn motivates members to deepen their commitment and involvement in group activities. This increased engagement further enhances the interaction yields good ROIlikelihood of achieving positive outcomes, members will elevate reinforcing the [[trust]] and solidifying the group's cohesion.Such a dynamic not only promotes a sense of collective ownership and responsibility but also cultivates an environment where members feel empowered to contribute their best efforts, secure in the groupknowledge that their investments will yield fruitful returns. Ultimately, this self-reinforcing process of trust and favorable ROIs can propel groups towards sustained success, enabling them to navigate challenges more effectively and will invest capitalize on opportunities more in group effortsefficiently.