I propose This paper introduces a mechanistic model that delineates the intricate cognitive processes involved in decision-making involves several interconnected . Drawing from psychological and epistemological perspectives, the proposed model elucidates the interplay of various mental elements working collaboratively during the decision-making process. The components include the identification of needs, consideration of stakeholders, formulation of questions, generation of options, and the subsequent evaluation, selection, and implementation of decisions. Furthermore, the model incorporates the concept of a Mental Objects Network (MON) to formulate elucidate the role of interconnected theories in shaping decision outcomes. The paper underscores the importance of resource analysis, value attribution to outcomes, and the nuanced consideration of probability in optimizing decision outcomes. Additionally, it explores the influence of familiarity and external factors on decision selection, emphasizing the role of learning in the development of a decisioncorroborated System of Neural ([[SON]]) essential for better predictions. These key elements are:

===NeedIdentification===Every The decision originates from -making process commences with the identification of needs, representing a biological signaling processwithin the brain, signaling indicating a lack of essential resources as perceived by the brain. Resources These resources can be manifest in both physical or and emotionaldomains, aligning with established psychological perspectives paradigms such as [[Maslow's hierarchy of needs]].

[[stakeholdersStakeholders]] encompass , encompassing both organizational members and external individuals who may be affected entities, play a pivotal role in decision-making by virtue of being potential recipients of the organization's decisions or consequences stemming from organizational actions. Each individual possesses resources to contribute to the group effort to solve the problem. She may or may not contribute some A thorough understanding of these resources to stakeholders and their interests informs the group effortdecision-making process.

===Questionformulation===A [[question]] serves Questions serve as a mental tool to gather cognitive tools facilitating information gathering and initiate initiation of the decision-making process, addressing how . The formulation of relevant queries directs the subsequent exploration of potential solutions to fulfill the address identified needneeds.

Various ways exist to [[reward|fulfill]] a needThe decision space is delineated by the generation of options, each representing an “a potential avenue for [[optionreaward|fulfilling identified needs]].”These options, when meticulously analyzed, form the basis for subsequent evaluation and selection.

Options are implementations The proposed model introduces the concept of the brain's theories about the world, interconnected in a network known as the Mental Objects Network ([[MON]])to elucidate the interconnected nature of theories within the brain.The MON comprises , comprised of mental objects representing our understanding of the world, influencing how we shape our surroundings to meet our needsplays a crucial role in shaping decision outcomes. 

===OutcomesAnalysis===Each [[Every option]] results culminates in [[specific outcomes]], some of which fulfill each carrying a distinct value that may range from rewarding to taxing. The theory emphasizes the identified need, while others may have unintended side effectsfor a nuanced evaluation of these outcomes to inform decision-making.

Every [[option]] consumes [[resources]], necessitating a consideration of available resources when evaluating options. Resource analysis is integral to the decision-making process, as each option consumes resources. A judicious consideration of available resources is essential in assessing the feasibility and sustainability of potential decisions.

Outcomes carry a [[value]]have varying values, ranging from rewarding to neutral or taxing, affecting our physical or and emotional resources. Each stakeholder has different resources and values, which affect the value of each option.

he probability of success is a critical factor influencing decision-making. Each option has , constructed as a cascade of events, carries varying[[Probability probabilities of success|chances . The theory should relate to the nuances of success]]probability estimation, influenced by the probability of events within the option's cascade.Confidence in predicting an event's occurrence may depend on including known probabilities or and the level of corroboration through testing theories.