Open main menu

Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki β

Changes

Analytic model

35 bytes added, 07:57, 8 February 2016
no edit summary
Different people have different levels of theories. In further parts of this book we will address the [[Laymen-experts gap|consequences of these differences]].
 
====Falsification====
In order to corroborate the solutions , the solutions should be put to a scrutiny and falsification.
====Common Goal====
When we try to fulfill a need, we have several options which we can follow to fulfill the need. The options are based on the theories we have on the SON or MON. Every option has also other implications, that can be caused if we will follow them. For instance, if we want to fulfil our need to drink, and we will choose the option of juice, we may solve the need, but one of the implications may be weight gain, due too much caloric value the juice contains.
===Evaluationand Selection=======Falsification====In order to corroborate the solutions , the solutions should be put to a scrutiny and falsification.
====Value====
Every implication that each options carry with it, has a value for us. The juice may have good taste, which has positive value for us, and also to high caloric value, if we want to lose weight, and therefore it’s value is negative. For every option there are positive and negative values.
 
====Evaluation====
The value we put on each implication, may vary. When we are kids, we do not put any value of caloric intake, but as we get older, and the caloric intake may have implication on our health or weight, we may start to change the evaluation of too much caloric intake.