Usually, more some participants will have more difficulties basing their theories on evidence. their thories are usually based on inner feelings that the thories answer. The new theories, should address these feeling and elevate their well being. For instance, it is said that religion give meaning and produce better communities. although religion is based of faith rather then on hard evidence, it answer the need for community and meaning. In deliberation between seculars and religious people, a new corroborated theory that answer the above feelings should be produced.

We should try to set goals and milestones to create the vision. We should set options, and select them, by our ability to deliver them, by it's [[ROI]] and by their correspondence to our values.

If the values are not homogeneous in the group, they should be discussed and explored to achieve better understanding and coordination.

To achieve creativity we should start with free brainstorming, synthesis and the selecting. We should try to design from high level to low level. In each level we should use several options and select from them by using parmeters of theories ([[corroboration]]), values and [[ROI]].

To try to make the process more knowledgeable and more effective, one might try to synthesize between different options. She might also try to find new solutions, when other options are been criticized.

According to the goals, the [[ROI]], the corroboration of the theories, the exprience and the values, the group should select minmum set of options to put to the test.

To see if the solution works, develop it and test it. If it works, put it to decision makers to allocate resources, if it doesn't work, go back to development or choose another option.