Open main menu

Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki β

Changes

Systematic Decision Making

1,487 bytes added, 08:27, 4 August 2015
First exploration of the field
===First exploration of the field===
To achieve the vision we should get familiar with the field. We should ask ourselves general questions like, what do we know about this field of knowledge? What are the obstacles to achieve the vision.
 
==SON Facilitation==
A SON should be researched and learned by mutual investigation of [[SO]]s, [[values]] and [[theory|theories]]. People are attuned to [[storytelling]], and therefore, storytelling should be used to investigate [[corroboration]] of theories, values and SOs. Experts could also teach participents in their field of expertise.
 
All objects of the field of decision, should be put to falsification and corroboration (with the consideration of trust and safe feelings of the [[stakeholders]]).
 
When clashing theories are raised, a falsifiable synthesis or a new falsifiable theory that explains all corroborated evidences should be produced, otherwise a clashes of theories can emerge and brake the deliberative process. If no such theory can be produce, we can advise participants to hold their judgment until new theory will emerge or one of the theories will gain sufficient corroboration.
 
Usually, more some participants will have more difficulties basing their theories on evidence. their thories are usually based on inner feelings that the thories answer. The new theories, should address these feeling and elevate their well being. For instance, it is said that religion give meaning and produce better communities. although religion is based of faith rather then on hard evidence, it answer the need for community and meaning. In deliberation between seculars and religious people, a new corroborated theory that answer the above feelings should be produced.
===What are our plans to achieve the vision?===