3,078
edits
Changes
→Environmental Causes for Conservatism and Liberalism
It seems that that r and k strategies, also apply to breeding patterns in humane societies. Liberal societies where there are plenty of resources and life are safe tend to sustain a lower birth ratio compared to conservative societies, in which poverty is prevailing and life are less protected.
While r and k selection is well documented strategies for birth, I'll suggest that conservatism and liberalism are two strategies for group behavior in the face of dangerous or safe environment: conservatism . One of the reason that help me suggest such hypothesis is a strategy fit research done by Jonathan Haidt. Haidt found that conservatives and liberals have different attitudes towards six values. The values are loyalty, respect for danger authority, fairness, sexuality, defend from harm and liberty. Liberals tend to value loyalty and limited resources authority less then conservatives. Liberals tend to have a less strict need for controlling the sexuality. Conservatives tend to legitimize punishment of insubordinate individuals and groups, while liberalism is used liberals tend to defend the unorthodox. Conservatives see fairness as a reward for safe surroundings an investment, while liberals tend to share more resources and abundance distribute them more evenly, regardless of resourcesone's investment. And of course, liberals tend to value liberty in the face of society more then conservatives does.
==high levels proposed causes of liberalism and conservatism==