3,078
edits
Changes
→Sociology
In this respect, when one is in cometition with others for control, he will try to show all their mistakes, and will strength her ideas. This may be the cause of the failuer of Eli Zeria, the Chif intelegence branch in the IDF to see the comming war with Egypt in October 1973<ref>Zvi Zamir, In open eyes, 2011, Zmora-Bitan ("בעיניים פקוחות: ראש המוסד מתריע: האם ישראל מקשיבה?", בהוצאת כנרת זמורה-ביתן דביר.)</ref>.
===Trust===
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,24, 482-95.</ref><ref>Mendelberg, T. (2002). The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence.
Political Decisionmaking, Deliberation and Participation, 6, 151-193. (Overview)</ref>
==Groups Interactions==
[[Gastil and Black framework]] gives four aspects of socilogy of deliberation:
#All participants should have equal and adequate speaking opportunities.
#All participants should attempt to comprehend one another’s views.
#All participants should make efforts to fully consider each other’s input.
#All participants should demonstrate respect for each other.
Researc show that virtuals teams need to estavlish relational variables early in their formation in FtF meetings<ref>Poole, M. S., & Zhang, H. (2005). Virtual teams. The Handbook of Group Research and Practice, 363–385.</ref>
==Settings that Effects Deliberation==