3,078
edits
Changes
→Other perspectives of the legitimacy of deliberation
# '''Ethic''' - Good deliberation will take the needs of all members and will produce optimal inclusive solutions. A solution that will enable all members to feel that they are benefiting from being a members in the group.
# '''Democratic''' - People will engage shared challenges, will recognize and understand on other citizens, and will be responsible for the acts taken by the state. This will make the citizens influential, involved and responsible. It will strength the [[social capital]] and the education of the citizens. It will strive to get as much inclusive solution so that everybody will feel that she or he is been concerned as important and equal citizen.
'''Cohen J.'''<ref>Cohen,Joshua.1989.Deliberation and democratic legitimacy.Pp. 67–92 in Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit (eds), The Good Polity. Oxford: Blackwell. p.22</ref>:
Young <ref>Young,IrisMarion.1996.Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. Pp.120–35 in Seyla Benhabib(ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton:Princeton University Press. p.122</ref>
See also the Trilemma of democratic reform, in James Fishkin, When the people speak, 2009 ,and Fung 2006<ref>Fung, A. (2006), "Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance", Public Administration Review-Washington Dc- 66: 66–75</ref>
==References==
<references/>
[[category: deliberation]]