Difference between revisions of "Evaluating deliberation technologies in comparison to the "General Process of Deliberation""
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | By comparing different technologies with the [[General process of deliberation|GPD]], we can uncover what are the elements of good technologies in facilitating | + | <h3>By comparing different technologies with the [[General process of deliberation|GPD]], we can uncover what are the elements of good technologies in facilitating deliberation.</h3> |
+ | |||
+ | In this section, I will take well proven deliberative technologies like Google, StackOverflow, Wikipedia, and less than good almost-deliberative technologies like twitter, forums, Facebook, and compare all of them to our technologies: [https://delib.tech Delib], [https://consenz.co.il/ Consenz], [https://www.whysaurus.com/ Whysaurus]. By doing so, I hope to find what we are missing and help improve deliberative apps. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==First-line deliberative technologies== | ||
+ | These technologies are very good at harassing the wisdom of the crowds to create high-quality solutions. | ||
+ | ===Google=== | ||
+ | Google may not seem like a deliberative technology at first glance, but by understanding how it works, one might accept that it is a deliberative machine. | ||
+ | |||
− | |||
− | |||
Revision as of 06:42, 4 September 2020
Contents
By comparing different technologies with the GPD, we can uncover what are the elements of good technologies in facilitating deliberation.
In this section, I will take well proven deliberative technologies like Google, StackOverflow, Wikipedia, and less than good almost-deliberative technologies like twitter, forums, Facebook, and compare all of them to our technologies: Delib, Consenz, Whysaurus. By doing so, I hope to find what we are missing and help improve deliberative apps.
First-line deliberative technologies
These technologies are very good at harassing the wisdom of the crowds to create high-quality solutions.
Google may not seem like a deliberative technology at first glance, but by understanding how it works, one might accept that it is a deliberative machine.