Difference between revisions of "Rewards"
From Deliberative Democracy Institiute Wiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[short term rewards|short term rewards]] & [[long term rewards]]. [[Dopamine]] is involved in reward. | + | [[short term rewards|short term rewards]] & [[long term rewards]]. |
+ | |||
+ | [[Dopamine]] is involved in reward. Dopamine appear to play a central role in cost-benefit analysis<ref>Phillips PEM, Walton ME, Jhou TC. Calculating utility: Preclinical evidence for cost– benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191: 483– 495.</ref>. It seems to be part of the [[rewards|reward sytem]] There appear to be multiple dopamine-sensitive decision regions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Dopamine|Dopamine]] depletion in [[Ventral stratium|ventral striatum]] reduces propensity for physical effort <ref>Salamone JD, Correa M, Farrar A, Mingote SM. Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191: 461– 482.</ref> D1 ([[dopamine]] 1) receptor blockade in [[ACC]] reduces preference for expending effort for rats<ref>Schweimer J, Hauber W. Dopamine D1 receptors in the anterior cingulate cortex regulate effort-based decision-making. Learning & Memory. 2006;13: 777–782</ref>.It is non-discriminative between reward types, dopaminergic firing in [[VTA]] does appear to reflect subjective (action) value with integrated responses to both delay and reward amount<ref>Roesch MR, Calu DJ, Schoenbaum G. Dopamine neurons encode the better option in rats deciding between differently delayed or sized rewards. Nature Neuroscience. 2007;10: 1615– 1624.</ref>. Dopaminergic neurons send diffuse projections to [[striatum]] (nigrostriatal pathway) and prefrontal cortex (mesocortical pathway) and thereby transmit a pleasure values or [[learning|teaching]] signal to a variety of brain regions, for learning, stimulus evaluation, and directed action. <ref>Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, et al. Dopamine increases in striatum do not elicit craving in cocaine abusers unless they are coupled with cocaine cues. NeuroImage. 2008;39: 1266– 1273)</ref>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==References== | ||
+ | |||
+ | <references/> | ||
[[category:psychology]] | [[category:psychology]] | ||
[[category: decision making]] | [[category: decision making]] |
Revision as of 23:58, 29 June 2014
short term rewards & long term rewards.
Dopamine is involved in reward. Dopamine appear to play a central role in cost-benefit analysis[1]. It seems to be part of the reward sytem There appear to be multiple dopamine-sensitive decision regions.
Dopamine depletion in ventral striatum reduces propensity for physical effort [2] D1 (dopamine 1) receptor blockade in ACC reduces preference for expending effort for rats[3].It is non-discriminative between reward types, dopaminergic firing in VTA does appear to reflect subjective (action) value with integrated responses to both delay and reward amount[4]. Dopaminergic neurons send diffuse projections to striatum (nigrostriatal pathway) and prefrontal cortex (mesocortical pathway) and thereby transmit a pleasure values or teaching signal to a variety of brain regions, for learning, stimulus evaluation, and directed action. [5].
References
- ↑ Phillips PEM, Walton ME, Jhou TC. Calculating utility: Preclinical evidence for cost– benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191: 483– 495.
- ↑ Salamone JD, Correa M, Farrar A, Mingote SM. Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191: 461– 482.
- ↑ Schweimer J, Hauber W. Dopamine D1 receptors in the anterior cingulate cortex regulate effort-based decision-making. Learning & Memory. 2006;13: 777–782
- ↑ Roesch MR, Calu DJ, Schoenbaum G. Dopamine neurons encode the better option in rats deciding between differently delayed or sized rewards. Nature Neuroscience. 2007;10: 1615– 1624.
- ↑ Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, et al. Dopamine increases in striatum do not elicit craving in cocaine abusers unless they are coupled with cocaine cues. NeuroImage. 2008;39: 1266– 1273)